How SimDec Began: From PhD Spark to Sensitivity Analysis Innovation

Born from a tricky energy-investment model, SimDec evolved into a visual, industry-agnostic approach to sensitivity analysis and decision support.

October 26, 2025

Teaser

“Wait a minute—this isn’t just interesting.” That was the moment Prof. Julian Scott Yeomans realized SimDec was something new: a visual, exploratory way to see how inputs—and their interactions—shape outcomes across an entire distribution, not just a single point.

The backstory: a stubborn model and a long dog walk

SimDec started with a messy, real problem: evaluating renewable-energy policy and its impact on investment profitability. The model had many inputs, policy-induced thresholds, and non-linear effects. A standard Monte Carlo run produced a weird, multi-peaked distribution of Net Present Value—clearly meaningful, but hard to explain.

After getting stuck in building endless scenarios by hand, a cool idea came to mind on a dog walk:
run everything, then decompose the full output distribution into interpretable scenarios formed by ranges of key inputs.
Once decomposed, every “mystery peak” in the distribution suddenly made sense. You could point to a scenario—e.g., “all critical inputs in the green range”—and see why profitability held even under volatile markets.

Pull-quote: “Every single peak became clear once we decomposed the distribution.”

The defense that changed the roadmap

At the PhD defense, external examiner Prof. Julian Scott Yeomans—known for simulation optimization and metaheuristics—saw this decomposition and paused: he hadn’t seen anything like it. It looked like visual exploratory data analysis for simulation—interactive, transparent, and useful to non-specialists.

That defense turned into a lively debate and, afterward, a collaboration. The focus shifted from “just another case study” to developing SimDec as a general method.

From one domain to many

Early applications quickly piled up:

The pattern was consistent: if there’s a model with inputs and an output, SimDec can decompose it. Units don’t matter—kilowatts, euros, people, even dogs 🐶—as long as the model maps inputs to outputs.

Why classic sensitivity analysis falls short

Traditional sensitivity analysis mostly asks, “Which factor is most important?” That’s useful—but incomplete. SimDec goes further:

Pull-quote: “It’s not a single value—it’s the entire distribution under each scenario.”

From plots to decisions

The practical payoff is actionability. SimDec highlights scenarios that hit your target outcome range and shows where to lock key inputs. If you can’t meet the ideal scenario, it reveals second-best paths—e.g., slightly lower investment but medium production; or different combinations that still achieve acceptable results.

Typical insights SimDec exposes:

This is why the method resonates with both researchers and practitioners: it compresses weeks of ad-hoc scenario tinkering into a single, interpretable visual.

Why visual matters (and for whom)

Mathematical interaction terms get messy fast. SimDec keeps the math under the hood and surfaces evidence visually, so teams can align quickly:

Pull-quote: “SimDec eliminates expert myopia by showing all key scenarios simultaneously.”

Where it’s heading

The team is extending SimDec in two directions:

  1. Beyond simulation to observational datasets when the data-generating process is complex but decomposable.
  2. From visuals to language—turning a SimDec plot into plain-language recommendations so anyone can act confidently.

The long-term ambition is straightforward: make SimDec a global standard for sensitivity analysis across engineering, finance, environment, and beyond.

Key takeaways

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Prof. Julian Scott Yeomans for recognizing the method’s potential, and to Tibo (the very patient dog) for the inspiring walks that sparked SimDec’s core idea.